Grappling in karate
Hengest
I don't know why I didn't think to ask this question before, but anyways...
As most of you who have been here a while are probably aware, it's my theory that 90% of karate dojo, if not more, actually teach karate incorrectly in that, regardless of ryuha, they generally only teach a small part of karate's original curriculum, i.e. the long range kicking and punching.
Since it's a common saying among karateka that kata is karate, and kata contain numerous techniques for grappling and CQ combat in general, why aren't these taught? Most dojo only seem to teach the kata itself, and spend little time on bunkai (and when they do it's often incorrect) and even less time on drilling and sparring with the techniques. No wonder most non-karateka MAists aren't convinced about karate's effectiveness.
So, I just wanted to do a little survey. Of karateka past and present here, in the dojo do/did you ever learn grappling or CQ techniques? Are/were they only standing techniques or did you learn groundfighting as well? And if you don't/didn't learn that kind of stuff, what have you done about learning and coping with this range of combat?
Cheers,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Gong*Sao*
I didn't see any grappling done in the dojo I was at for a little while, although I wasn't there very long. We did some close range techniques, such as elbows and wrist grab defenses (the ones in the katas). Mostly, though, it was step kumite from a long range and katas. I didn't see anyone, even the shodans and above doing any kind of groundwork or even full contact sparring. See the previous sentences for an explanation as to why I no longer train there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bushi
The style and school I trained in concentrated on Bunkai and Yes there was Grappling from the Katas mostly standing, very little ground work....Oh thats GoJu Ryu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
setsu nin to
Hengest
In my opinion moust of Karate Dojos is based on sport, even is Sensei claim that its traditional moust of it will be sport.
When Karate come to the west it become very popular, than it was developed as sport ant it become very popular as sport too. People liked it, but they newer get right aproach to it. It become sport. There is no more Senseis like Sensei Gogen Yamaguchi or Sensei Seikichi Odo, if you ask people who are in Karate moust of them even whant know who they were. moust of todays Senseis are exsports which cariere is over, but they kept sport aproach to the art, not martial art aproach. There is no more martial arts value in moust Karate Dojos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blade
It seems as there is a stupid division in karate dojos.
they teach kata, then in kumite practice there is no sign of anything learned in kata... so kata is there just to fill up time trainning and get new belts

.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA dude
There are newer conteperary karate styles like enshin that have grappling and groundfighting. Daidojuku I heard has borrowed heavily from bjj's groundgrappling. There are other newer styles that teach this. For traditional styles I think goju ryu schools tend to keep grappling a part of the curriculum more than other styles. I have only heard of one shotkan school that kept the whole grappling curriculum.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jlambvo
I've heard the speculation that when the first foreigners were given their black belts back in the 50's and 60's, they took it as some indication of mastery when in reality it was one of dedication--ie, they were only then about to begin learning the real art. Unfortunately, it was what they were given (conditioning and combative exercises) that promulgated as karate throughout much of the world. No one seemed to pay notice to the fact that the karate they had was stiff, blocky, and rigid in practice, while the old masters would fight fluidly and relaxed across many ranges.
Several of the Hatsumi-den ryu have been interchangebly known as karate in the past; I've heard of Gyokko ryu, Koto ryu, and Kukishinden ryu's striking referred to as karate or karate-jutsu, probably a couple others as well over time. This has probably been the case with other martial arts of Japan. Is the discussion restricted to Okinawan arts?
I'm not clear if there is a consensus on whether Okinawan karate is indigineous to that region, or if there is an acknowledged Chinese influence (eg translating it as China hand). Although the three ryu above are not Okinawan, they certainly have strong Chinese roots. They're striking either flows in and out of joint manipulation and throws, or these are induced percussively. If you do the partnered waza motions as a solo form, I guess there are many parallels to Okinawan karate kata.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
paa069
Ive never seen karate grappling, but i would assume that it is somewhat like japanese jiujitsu, since karate is japanese. Not sure though
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hengest
quote:
Is the discussion restricted to Okinawan arts?
That was my intention, but then to be fair I hadn't considered the point about the Bujinkan ryuha jlambvo. I've heard Koto Ryu desribed as karate before, but I didn't know about the other two.
As for karate's roots, the jury's still out on whtehr karate is essentially a Chinese art, but the influence of Chinese arts cannot be denied, particularly from Fukien province. The Okinawan Bubishi makes no bones about the fact that the techniques it illustrates are kung fu techniques.
But anyway, it's interesting that both setsu and jlambvo raise the point about karate's transition to the West and its watering down. However, although the West has certainly played a part, I think the Okinawans themselves are just as much to blame. After all it was Itosu himself that diluted his curriculum when he started teaching karate to Okinawan school kids. It's just a shame that this diluted form was basically what became karate in the West.
What MA Dude said about Enshin and Daidojuku is interesting but does anybody know whether they've resurrected karate's original grappling syllabus and then added BJJ, or have they just gone straight to BJJ? It would be a crying shame if it's simply the latter, although I fear that's the most likely situation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA dude
I am pretty sure Daidojuku karate went the latter. I am not sure about Enshin its grappling seems mostly standup grappling with a few things like the armbar, but I am guessing they just took some from judo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EvilScott
It really depends on the school more than the style, I think. You can teach things that aren't neccassarily karate at a karate school, ie. at my WC school we do Kali for stick/knife training.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hengest
quote:
It really depends on the school more than the style, I think. You can teach things that aren't neccassarily karate at a karate school, ie. at my WC school we do Kali for stick/knife training.
This is kind of my point Scott. It's not a question of teaching something that isn't karate. It's a matter of teaching something that is very much karate that's missing at most karate schools. Almost any karate ryuha, by the nature of the kata they have selected to form their curriculum, should be teaching a large amount of CQC and grappling, yet hardly any do.
But you are right when you say it depends on the school.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jlambvo
According to the Dayton, OH Bujinkan website, Momochi Sandayu's name for Gyokko ryu was Gyokko Ryu Hicho Karate Koppojutsu .
The unarmed technique of Kukishinden ryu seems to be known by many names. I skimmed over a copy of the densho which divided its techniques into categories of dakentaijutsu and jutaijutsu, perhaps an indication of the influence of Takagi Yoshin ryu (which was a close ally in more modern times). I think it previously was, or is now alternatively, simply entitled kumi uchi (as written on the Kuki clan website), since historically the unarmed technique of this school would have developed for coming to grips while fighting in armor. It does however make extensive use of heavy striking combined with grappling that could easily resemble karate, and I recall shidoshi Tony Brooks and shihan Kevin Schnieder referring to it as karate- jutsu , even peforming one partnered kata motion as a solo form to demonstrate similarities. Although the Chinese connection to this tradition is distant, it is built upon the Amatsu Tatara which supposedly goes back 2000-2500 years to Chinese and Tibetan immigrants (there are more in-depth sites but here's a quick note:
http://www.dallas.net/~butchj/genera...formation.html).
Neither of these go into much groundfighting, probably due to the impracticality of ne waza in heavy armor and predominant use of weaponry; when the opponent goes down, the kata call for drawing a backup weapon to finish him (the takedowns are quite debilitating in and of themselves). It wouldn't suprise me if there was little groundfighting in any karate tradition since the opponent's wouldn't try to fight you there...? That's just speculation.
I don't direct most of this BJK stuff at you Hengest, particularily about Kukishin ryu, since (correct me if I'm wrong) the Genbukan seems to emphasize the Amatsu scrolls more than Hatsumi. I'm curious what you think of that however, my knowledge on it has been limited largely to web resources.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------