I must admit that I haven't read the article, mainly because the art doesn't interest me, but I definitely do think that you could conceivably have something very different from JKD based around the same principles. Bruce Lee was short, fairly thin, in impeccable condition and initially received training in Wing Chun and a little bit of a longer northern style. Imagine what it would look like if a Taijiquan guy had decided to supplement his training with weapons work from Kali or if a Sumo picked up western boxing to add more strikes to his arsenal. The concept of JKD isn't anything new, and when you compare what Lee was doing to something like what most MMA guys use, there's a huge difference despite the fact that both "use what works and discard what doesn't". If you want to treat it as just a philosophy, then you really can't study at a school. Truly following JKD would be going out on your own, achieving a high level of competence in an art, then doing the same with a few others, and battle testing what you know regularly so you can keep working on the techniques that work better for you. I have nothing against JKD schools at all, but if you're going to mess with semantics and say that it's a philosophy, you can't say that you train in JKD. Besides, speaking of names, JKD itself has JKDC, OJKD (I think, I can't remember what that stands for), SBGi, and a swarm of others. |